Which Practice Area is intended for identifying issues with expert input?

The correct answer is Peer Reviews because this practice area specifically involves bringing together a group of experts or peers to assess and critique work products. Peer reviews are designed to identify defects, inconsistencies, or issues early in the development process while leveraging the knowledge and experience of the participants. The input from these experts provides valuable insights that can help improve the quality of the work.

In the context of Peer Reviews, the focus is on collaborative evaluation, where peers not only identify potential issues but also share knowledge and recommend solutions based on their expertise. This practice can significantly enhance the overall quality of the project by ensuring that multiple perspectives are considered before finalizing any deliverables.

Other areas like Technical Reviews, Stakeholder Engagement, and Risk Assessment have different focuses. Technical Reviews may assess the technical aspects and adherence to technical specifications but may not emphasize soliciting expert insights in the same collaborative manner as Peer Reviews. Stakeholder Engagement primarily revolves around gathering and understanding the needs and expectations of stakeholders, while Risk Assessment is focused on identifying and managing potential risks within a project, rather than specifically identifying issues through expert collaboration.