Which of the following practices are aimed at addressing performance issues with poor quality?

Peer reviews are a crucial practice aimed at identifying and addressing performance issues related to poor quality. This technique involves the systematic evaluation of a product or project by one or more people who are not directly involved in its creation. The primary purpose of peer reviews is to catch defects or shortcomings early in the development process, thereby improving overall quality.

By engaging multiple perspectives, peer reviews can highlight flaws that the original creators might have overlooked, leading to a more thorough understanding of quality issues and allowing for timely corrective actions. This collaborative approach not only enhances the quality of the work but also facilitates knowledge sharing among team members, contributing to a culture of continuous improvement.

In contrast, the other practices mentioned do not directly focus on resolving quality-related performance issues in the same targeted manner. While decision analysis aids in making informed choices based on data, risk management is more about identifying potential risks rather than directly addressing existing quality problems. Supplier management involves overseeing external vendors to ensure quality but does not inherently address performance issues within the internal processes.