In what context are Peer Reviews (PR) typically utilized?

Peer Reviews are utilized primarily in the context of identifying defects in work products. This practice involves a systematic examination of a product or process by colleagues or peers to detect errors, inconsistencies, or areas for improvement before the work proceeds to later stages in development. By engaging team members who have a fresh perspective and relevant expertise, Peer Reviews foster collaboration and knowledge sharing, facilitating the early detection of issues that could lead to costly rework if addressed later in the development cycle.

The identification of defects through Peer Reviews not only enhances the quality of work products but also increases team engagement and ownership as members contribute their insights. This preemptive approach ultimately leads to higher quality outcomes, reduced waste, and improved project efficiency, aligning with quality assurance practices within frameworks like CMMI.